ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00008055
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A cleaner | A cleaning company |
Representatives | None | None |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00010672-001 | 05/04/2017 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 04/08/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Kevin Baneham
Procedure:
At the time the adjudication was scheduled to commence, it became apparent that there was no appearance by or on behalf of either the complainant or the respondent. I verified that both parties were on notice of the date, time and venue of the accommodation and waited some time for a late arrival.
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of the respondent. |
Findings and Conclusions:
As the complainant did not attend the adjudication to advance their complaint, I do not make any findings or conclusions. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
CA-00010672-001 As the complainant did not attend to advance their complaint, I deem that the complaint made pursuant to the Organisation of Working Time Act is not well-founded. |
Dated: 18th December 2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Kevin Baneham